1.6T OSFP DAC

1.6T OSFP TO OSFP DAC 1m

Rate1.6TReach1mWavelength-Interface-
Fiberland part number
FLD-1.6T-OSFP-DAC-1
Unit priceAsk Our Manager

Key Specifications

Select a specification to see how it affects model selection.

View complete table
Form TypeOSFP ~ OSFP

Check this recorded value against the target device and project requirements before quotation approval.

Technical Specifications

Filter the product record by the information needed for engineering or purchasing review.

14 specifications shown
Fiberland Part NumberFLD-1.6T-OSFP-DAC-1Vendor NameFIBERLAND
Data Rate1.6TWavelength-
Reach1mForm TypeOSFP ~ OSFP
Optical Interface-DDM Support-
Commercial Temp.0~70℃Industrial Temp.-
Compatible BrandsCisco,Huawei,Nvidia...200+ brandsComplianceCE,FCC,ROHS,REACH
Warranty3 YearsMode-

Product Compatibility Mapping

Cross-reference the original manufacturer part number with the corresponding Fiberland part number before confirming the target device and firmware.

Search Full Compatibility Database
Verified cross-references3 manufacturer part numbersAcross 1 brand
Showing 3 of 3 verified matches

Swipe horizontally to view every field.

Original part numberBrandFiberland part numberProduct description
C-O1T6-O1T6-1MARISTAFLD-1.6T-OSFP-DAC-11600GBASE-CR8 OSFP IHS to OSFP IHS passive twinax direct-attach copper cable, 1 m.
C-R1T6-R1T6-1MARISTAFLD-1.6T-OSFP-DAC-11600GBASE-CR8 OSFP RHS to OSFP RHS passive twinax direct-attach copper cable, 1 m.
C-O1T6-R1T6-1MARISTAFLD-1.6T-OSFP-DAC-11600GBASE-CR8 OSFP IHS to OSFP RHS passive twinax direct-attach copper cable, 1 m.

A part-number cross-reference is a model-selection starting point, not a blanket device guarantee. Final fit depends on the exact device, firmware or OS, target port and requested coding profile.

See Where This Product Fits in the Network

Review common data-center, DCI, campus, server and metro-network connections before confirming speed, reach, fiber type and connector.

Application planning

Optical Transceiver Application and Link Map

Compare representative network topologies and link paths to identify the appropriate product family for the intended deployment.

View full application diagram
Optical transceiver application diagram covering data center, DCI, campus, server and metro networks

Review the Quality-Control and Test Flow

Follow the checkpoints used to verify materials, firmware, optical performance, temperature stability, compatibility and final inspection.

Testing and quality

Quality Control and Test Flow

Review the sequence from material verification and firmware programming through optical, temperature, compatibility and final QA inspection.

View full testing diagram
Quality control flow covering material, firmware, optical, temperature, compatibility and final QA checks

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to common compatibility, installation and troubleshooting questions.

What is EEPROM coding in an optical transceiver?

EEPROM coding stores identification and operating information such as vendor data, part number, wavelength, interface characteristics, and other parameters read by the host equipment.

Does using compatible optics affect transmission distance?

Compatibility coding itself does not determine transmission distance. Reach is primarily determined by the optical specification, fiber type, wavelength, link loss, connector quality, and network design.

Are compatible transceivers suitable for telecom networks?

Compatible modules can be used in telecom and service-provider environments when they meet the required optical specifications, environmental requirements, protocols, and host compatibility.

Why is the transceiver recognized but DDM/DOM information is missing?

The module may be recognized while diagnostic monitoring is not fully supported by the host platform or compatibility profile. Check whether both the transceiver and network device support DDM/DOM for that interface.

Why does a high-speed compatible transceiver show FEC errors?

FEC errors may result from incompatible FEC settings, excessive optical loss, signal-quality problems, incorrect fiber infrastructure, or incompatible link parameters. Verify that both ends use the required FEC mode for the interface.

Tell Us What Your Project Needs

Engineering resources

Technical proof for faster project review

Move from model selection to internal approval with the documents, compatibility checks and verification paths buyers use most.